I’m pissed. Partly at myself, and partly at the fucking doctor at the walk-in clinic we brought Swee’pea to on Friday night. I alluded to this stuff in my earlier post where I focused on whining about how I was going crazy, and now I will treat you to a far fuller discussion of it than you could possibly want.
But first, some long and involved preamble.
I have long considered myself a pretty educated, critical consumer of health care. It helps that I have found myself suffering ill health and the medical profession could offer me no help and no answers. It does a lot to shake your faith in god-like medicine to discover that it is neither omniscient nor omnipotent. It helps that I was forced to take responsibility for my own health and do my own research, and that I found wellness in a more naturopathic, holistic approach.
Navigating the sea of conflicting health research and propaganda we all swim in (not to mention overburdened doctors, and a failing health care system) I have come to trust my instincts. I make my decisions based on what makes sense to me, what seems logical, and what seems to carry the least risk. I read the latest sensationalized medical studies with a critical eye and question their correlations and conclusions (if I get around to reading them, that is).
When I was pregnant, I continued to take responsibility for my own health decisions (which of course contained the health of my anonymous bump), with the help of midwives. I tried a prenatal vitamin but it gave me such gut-rot all I wanted to eat was buttered toast, which I didn’t think was conducive to meeting a pregnant body’s increased nutritional needs. I kept up my B-50 complex (which includes folic acid), because I saw on the prenatal vitamin that it was mostly B-vitamins and iron. I didn’t take additional iron supplements but tried to eat iron-rich foods like dried apricots and spinach, both raw and cooked, and others. In my reading, I discovered that the absorption rate of supplemental iron is questionable. I also read somewhere that your body can also adjust how much iron it absorbs from food and when it is exposed to a diet high in iron it actually absorbs a smaller percentage of iron than it does with a diet low in iron; during pregnancy, your absorption of iron also increases. So I trusted my cravings and my belief that in general a varied and healthful diet should be able to meet a person’s nutritional needs.
Around week 32, the midwives tested my blood and discovered that my iron level was borderline. I decided to take an iron supplement that was reportedly gentler on my stomach (I think it was called Palaver or something, and it didn't cause me any distress) and continue eating iron rich foods. What interested me was that they drew the blood before Christmas, but I didn’t get the results until we were into January. While I was visiting my parents over Christmas, I suddenly really wanted some of the sausage my dad was barbecuing, the first time I’d ever wanted red meat in years. So I went with the craving and ate half a sausage, slightly afraid that any more than that would make me feel sick. I was quite pleased to discover after the fact that my haemoglobin had been low when I experienced that craving. Anyways, by the time they took my blood for the c-section, my haemoglobin was back up to a healthy level.
I’m getting all tangential though when the point I really want to make is that I have a pretty high level of confidence in my ability to take responsibility for my own health, and that this confidence continued in large part while I was pregnant.
But that all changed when Swee’pea was born. Maybe it started with the medicalized labour and necessarily surgical birth, or maybe with our positive hospital experience, much to my surprise. Or maybe it started before that when I chose to get the rhogam shot around 28 weeks, even though it creeped me out to get someone else’s blood bits put inside me, for the sake of not even the baby I was carrying then but for some maybe baby out there in the future.
But really, I think it started when I finally got to hold my pink little baby and inspect him from his old soul eyes to his long skinny toes and contemplate his perfection. Or, not so much his perfection, as his rightness. I know we all say it so much that it’s become a cliché but even now, 15 months on, I still occasionally marvel at his magic. At the risk of being vomitously cheesy, I am still in awe that we have been graced with his miraculous presence, not miraculous because of odds that were overcome or because he survived a distressing labour but out of a new understanding of the miracle of life. Oh yeah, and how ill-equipped I felt for caring for him. I remember the nurse bringing him in after he’d been in the nursery for five hours and she said, “He’s hungry and he’s all yours.” I remember thinking that there was something really wrong in that, handing off a hungry baby to a total greenhorn and just leaving us. Alone with him. I mean, exactly what were we supposed to do with him?
Anyways… faced with the enormous task of keeping alive this most precious being ever to come upon this earth was, and sometimes still is, a little overwhelming. I felt completely unprepared.
Take the question of vaccination. I started to do research on the subject when I was pregnant, which was even then a nightmare. The governments say that reports of autism associated with the MMR vaccine are a myth and have been disproven. They say that vaccines are safe and have very few serious complications, that the few complications that may arise vastly outweigh the consequences of the disease. But I could never find actual numbers to back that up. I couldn’t anywhere see risks of the vaccine put next to risks of the disease.
On the flip side, the anti-vaccination faction seems to use a lot of emotional language that minimizes the risks of the diseases themselves and first-hand reports from parents whose children were affected or killed by very serious complications of vaccines. I still couldn’t find any numbers, which I think may have made me feel more comfortable. How many kids die or have brain damage from vaccines vs. those catastrophic effects from the disease?
And besides, it’s all fine and dandy to crunch numbers (or try to) and weigh risks and benefits when you’re dealing with a creature you’ve only seen in black and white outlines; it’s quite another to try to take that approach when you are talking about the most amazing, most precious, most beautiful thing you have ever laid eyes on. Even if the risks are 1 in 100 billion, the possibility that YOUR precious could be The One is impossible to contemplate.
In the end, we just decided that we had to put our trust in our paediatrician, and hope for the best. She is very much in favour of vaccines. At times, her arguments feel like they veer towards fear mongering, but since I can’t find the information I would need to make a truly informed decision, we go with her risk assessment.
I have found myself taking Swee’pea to the doctor at the drop of a hat, seeking reassurance that he isn’t dying, that I’m not going to miss an important clue that he needs immediate care, that he is ok. This craving for a doctor’s reassurance has lessened somewhat since he’s gotten bigger and better able to communicate. But I still find myself trusting doctors in a way I don’t think I would for myself. Of course, I can feel my own symptoms and judge their severity. With Swee’pea, he’s not an effective enough communicator to describe the intricacies of his symptoms and severity, so I have to guess from his behaviour and whatever information I can gather in the form of temperatures, wet diapers, and the like. I suspect that awareness that I can never really know for sure what Swee’pea is going through is where I trip up.
So… Friday night Swee’pea’s fever rose higher than he’s ever had (he hasn’t had many fevers, never for more than a few hours and never very high so it’s not really saying that much), so we took him to the walk-in clinic. I’d thought about taking him to our normal doctor’s but he’d seemed fine in the morning, and she takes Friday afternoons off, so I figured we’d just wait and see. By 8, I didn’t want to wait anymore and risk a trip to the ER at 2 am.
The clinic doctor checked out his ears and said his left ear was infected. I asked how he could tell so quickly and he said he saw red and that’s why they pay him the big bucks. He prescribed us an antibiotic, looked up the dosage in a big fat drug compendium and we duly filled it at the late night pharmacy.
Alarm bells did ring when the doctor said, as he ran his finger over the small print of the compendium, “I THINK [your pediatrician] is ok with me prescribing this drug.”
With hindsight, I should have asked why. I should have advocated that if there is something contentious about this drug, perhaps we should play it safe and choose a different one. I almost did, but then I chickened out, figuring he knew best.
By Sunday night, Swee’pea’s fever had broken, which led me to believe that the antibiotics were working, but he’d also developed a blotchy face and pinkening spots along his back, so I suspected perhaps a reaction to the antibiotics. On the advice of the pharmacist, we didn’t give Swee’pea any medicine that night and the next morning I took him to his doctor.
She shook her head as soon as I mentioned that the other doctor had prescribed azithromycin. She checked his ears and pronounced them perfect, and that if he had had an ear infection, they couldn’t look this good; it was way too soon. Apparently, children’s ears go red when they have a fever.
Not only was Swee’pea misdiagnosed, but the antibiotic he prescribed was like using a bulldozer to pick up a few grains of sand. Our paediatrician says it's the worst culprit for antibiotic resistance.
Why would a doctor prescribe an antibiotic that is known to be such a contributor to resistance? That doesn’t seem like prudent use at all. Our doctor didn’t know but she hypothesized that perhaps it was because it only takes a 3-day dose and hangs around in the system for a long time afterwards, so there’s more likelihood of completing the course.
So now instead of just being pissed off about Swee’pea getting misdiagnosed and unnecessary antibiotics, I am indignant too.
I’m educated. I know the risk of antibiotic resistance and would always finish a course of antibiotics. I never use antibiotic soaps because they contribute to antibiotic resistance and aren’t any more effective than proper use of regular old soaps anyways. After the SARS outbreak, the property manager at my workplace switched all the bathrooms’ dispensers to antibacterial soaps. I lobbied, unsuccessfully, to just stick to regular soap, especially since SARS was caused by a VIRUS -- not BACTERIA -- and therefore could not be killed by antibacterial soap. It still bothers me that I couldn’t make the slightest dent in that cause.
Anyways.
I have learned from this experience. Doctors are not gods. I cannot put all my trust in them for the survival of Swee’pea. I must trust those little alarm bells. There’s nothing wrong with questioning.
Ok, that's all... anyone still here?
Hello 2024
10 months ago
17 comments:
I'm indignant right along with you...and I can relate, too. I've gotten to be a bit more persistent and pushy with doctors--just because we've had to deal with so many. But I have done my share of being too "passive" even when alarm bells were going off. It's tough--I had to really re-evaluate my perception of doctors ever since Tessa was born. On the one hand I am somewhat in awe of them, but on the other, I have learned that *we* can actually learn what they know to a certain extent as it relates to ourselves and/or to our kids. They don't have a monopoly on the knowledge and they are not inside some sacred circle which we cannot breach.
I'm not saying that I think I have as much knowledge as a doctor who has been to medical school, but I have learned that I am the one, ultimately, who knows my kids (and myself) the best and this fact, combined with research on my own, can be a powerful tool.
I've had too many experiences such as you've described, and you really put your finger on the core of the issue. It's one thing to play wait-and-see and second guess doctors when it's my health, but my son is a different story altogether. And I hate it when I know I should be pushing more. Like the first time our son was on antibiotics and broke out in hives all over his body about 5 days into the 10-day course--and the doctor said it couldn't be an allergic reaction. Or the number of times we were told something couldn't be allergies (eczema, seasonal respiratory problems).
OK, I'll stop there.
I am resistant to a majority of antbiotics. I am also prone to extremely severe bacterial infections. I, um, try not to think about it.
This story makes me pretty mad, because of the way that Henry was treated when I took him to the ER for a high, high fever. They gave him every test imaginable in order to rule out the bad stuff and when nothing came up positive, sent us home with nothing more than motrin and instructions to visit our pediatrician the next morning. It was the absolute RIGHT thing to do. Henry's fever broke soon after and the pediatrician assured us that he was okay. He also assured us that we did the right thing bringing him to the ER.
Aargh. Just tried to post a comment and it disappeared. I'll try to recreate it.
I'm so sorry that you had to deal with that jerk at the walk-in (just hearing that he told you "that's why they pay [him] the big bucks" rubbed me the wrong way). It's so much easier, though, to take your chances and take time to research your options with your own health. But when it's your child, how can you do that?
The story I'm not telling in all of this posting about my family is that when my brother acquired his head injury, my mother took him to the hospital every day for a week, telling them there was something wrong. It wasn't until he lost his ability to walk that they finally checked him out and found that the injury had caused two blood clots to form in his brain. The medical establishment needs to get off their high horse and start listening to patients and their advocates. Argh.
i'm here. and feel you big time. we went through something like this w/ M and i was very upset - feeling like my concerns are being minimized and then cajoled (witn guilt) into taking drugs.
ugh. i hope he's better, friend.
I am so sick of doctors treating people like cattle. Literally. They herd us through waiting rooms and exam rooms, then talk to us like we are as dumb as cows. Sorry about such a rotten doc on Friday. Sounds like your pediatrician is a good egg, though.
It's so frustrating. But you're right, trust yourself.
The only time I didn't, Bee's very simple excema, brought on by an allergy to milk, was misdiagnosed at the walk-in clinic as 'dermatitus' - which means absolutely nothing, medically - and when left, became a full-fledged bacterial infection which had to be treated with antibiotic cream. It was (is) the only time that Bee has ever had antibiotics near her, and I still feel horrible that we let it go that far.
I'm totally done with walk-in clinics.
I totally agree. Doctors are not gods and they should stop thinking they are. I've had so much trouble with doctors (other than my own, very favorite GP) that I have only started going to the walk-in if it is absolutely, life-or-death necessary.
It's terrible that we should be afraid to seek medical treatment.
My second child, who was sick frequently, brought me into my own with doctors, nurses, ER and specialists. After what we went through I felt I had graduated with some kind of mommy medical degree and could go head to head with any of 'em at any old point in time. I earned that feeling; happily most of our caregivers afforded me the respect from day one, but some of them handed it over more begrudgingly than others.
You always have to do what you think is best, and the more you second guess that, the more crazy you'll drive yourself.
I was put on antibiotics at the first sign of a cough as a child, and now at 28 I'm sick a lot. You have a right to be concerned, and the mere fact that you are will go a long way toward Swee'pea being healthy.
still here, and completely with you.
i too operate partially on informed instinct when it comes to my own medical care, even while pregnant, even though i'm high risk. i certainly want doctors' help in measuring and testing and all those things their expertise is so important in, but i listen - all the more so after losing Finn in part because i didn't insist that they listen too - to my body and what seems "wrong."
but with O, it's harder, because like you said...he can't tell me what seems wrong to him. so i'm left watching him. and hoping that the people i have to put my trust in to get him help when i think something's wrong are worthy of that trust.
scary stuff, this.
i hope Swee'pea feels better soon...and that the overprescription of these bulldozer antibiotics stops soon.
Excellent book to read that I highly recommend.
How to Raise A Healthy Child In Spite of your Doctor..
T
I feel for you. This is why I try not to take my kids to the clinic. I'm grateful for them and will go when push comes to shove but in my experiences, I get a doctor who overmedicates too often.
Hope the babe is feeling better.
I think it takes a supreme amount of self-confidence (and education) to become a doctor, which is great, but when they cross the border into arrogance, it's awful. It's like they spent so much time in school that they don't want to be questioned by someone less educated. But, isn't that part of the job, too? The interpersonal skills? Being able to explain their opinion clearly, without talking down to their patients.
I just thanl my lucky stars that my child has been more or less healthy. I believe in avoiding the health care system where at all possible.
I'm with you on the SARS thing, I have some USA friends who think SARS was the Black Death up here.
Antibacterial soap isn't welcome in my house.
Post a Comment